Key Takeaways: Change without transformation - How narratives influenced the humanitarian cash agenda

By Sumeya Hussein

Link to original articlehttps://odi.org/en/publications/change-without-transformation-how-narratives-influenced-the-humanitarian-cash-agenda/?utm_source=ODI+updates&utm_campaign=69eca80db9-ODI_weekly_newsletter_040724&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1413423dcc-69eca80db9-76711130&ct=t%28ODI_weekly_newsletter_040724%29

The paper begins by pointing out that while the humanitarian sector seeks to present itself as neutral and evidence-led, humanitarian crises and responses to them are full of narratives and stories. Nevertheless, narratives are not an 'undesirable contrast' to evidence-based policymaking; rather, they play a crucial role in building understanding, proposing solutions, and driving change.

The simultaneous use of multiple narratives for different audiences tailored to their interest with incentives drove cash adoption, which has gone up from less than 1% to 20% of the total value of humanitarian assistance. The paper explores the key narratives used and what worked. It's important to be aware that evidence and narrative are not mutually exclusive; a rigorous evidence base is essential for compelling narrative-making in the humanitarian sector.

Any attempts at reform or narrative change in the humanitarian sector should acknowledge the earlier works of those who challenge dominant narratives but who were not viewed as 'legitimate narrative setters,' yet actively challenged dominant narratives and gave a voice to those directly impacted by humanitarian crises.